A Comprehensive Look at Squalane’s Role in Acne and Malassezia-Prone Skin

by f. c.

Introduction

Squalane has emerged as a sought-after emollient in skincare products marketed to individuals with acne and “fungal acne” (Malassezia folliculitis). The reasoning is that squalane—unlike many natural oils—lacks easily metabolizable fatty acids for acne-associated microbes and is more stable than squalene (its unsaturated counterpart in human sebum). Yet, evolving research on Malassezia’s lipase activity, squalene oxidation in acne pathogenesis, and the broader interplay of skin microbes raises questions about squalane’s role.

This article synthesizes the latest findings on squalane, drawing parallels with squalene oxidation in acne, Malassezia overgrowth in seborrheic or follicular conditions, and how other skin bacteria like Staphylococcus epidermidis and Cutibacterium acnes interact in the sebaceous follicle. By examining biochemical studies, dermatological data, and microbiological insights, we aim to present an evidence-based, comprehensive assessment of whether squalane is genuinely “safe” for acne-prone and Malassezia-sensitive skin.

The Microbial Ecosystem of Acne

Acne is traditionally associated with Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes), an anaerobic bacterium thriving in sebaceous follicles. However, research increasingly recognizes that other microbes—including Malassezia yeasts and Staphylococcus epidermidis—contribute to acne’s complexity [1,2,3].

  1. Malassezia: These lipophilic yeasts reside on oily regions of the skin and possess potent lipases. While Malassezia are more famously linked to seborrheic dermatitis and “fungal acne” (folliculitis), recent data suggest they can also exacerbate or parallel bacterial acne in some individuals. Their breakdown of sebum lipids can yield free fatty acids and inflammatory byproducts that influence comedone formation [1,3,4].
  2. Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes): Long recognized as a key player in acne, C. acnes releases lipases to hydrolyze triglycerides in sebum. The resulting free fatty acids may plug follicles and trigger innate immune responses through Toll-like receptor pathways, fueling inflammation [2].
  3. Staphylococcus epidermidis: A common skin commensal, S. epidermidis can occasionally mitigate C. acnes overgrowth by producing succinic acid and other metabolites. Nevertheless, it too can produce lipases and sometimes contribute to irritant byproducts. [10,11]

In recent years, multiple case studies and in vitro experiments have documented Malassezia in acne-like lesions—particularly in resistant or persistent papulopustular eruptions that do not respond well to standard antibiotics [2,3,5]. Antifungal treatments in these scenarios sometimes yield dramatic improvement, reinforcing the notion that acne should be viewed as a polymicrobial process rather than purely bacterial.

What Is Squalane?

Squalane (C₃₀H₆₂) is the fully hydrogenated (saturated) derivative of squalene (C₃₀H₅₀), an unsaturated hydrocarbon naturally present in human sebum at about 12–15%. While squalene contains multiple double bonds that render it prone to oxidation, squalane’s fully saturated structure makes it remarkably stable and resistant to forming irritating peroxides.

Key distinctions about Squalene:

Squalane shows negligible oxidation in typical skincare conditions. Squalene, by contrasts, readily forms peroxides (e.g., squalene hydroperoxide) under UV, pollution, or microbial oxidative stress, strongly contributing to comedogenic and inflammatory pathways. [6,7]

Squalane was historically sourced from shark liver oil, but is now commonly derived from olives or sugarcane via bio-fermentation. High-purity squalane (particularly from sugarcane) contains minimal impurities or unsaturated residues, further limiting oxidation risks.

As a lightweight emollient, squalane helps strengthen the stratum corneum barrier, reducing transepidermal water loss without providing the mid-chain fatty acids on which many skin microbes (including Malassezia) rely for rapid growth.

Does Squalene provide mid-chain fatty acids?

Not directly. However, squalene oxidation and enzymatic breakdown can generate lipid byproducts that may indirectly influence microbial activity. [6]

Squalene (C₃₀H₅₀) is a hydrocarbon, not a fatty acid. It does not contain an ester bond that could be hydrolyzed by lipases to release free fatty acids, unlike triglycerides or fatty acid esters.

Squalene oxidation, however, leads to the formation of squalene peroxides. These oxidative byproducts can degrade into shorter-chain lipid fragments that might be inflammatory or irritating to the skin barrier. [6,7]

Some microbes, including Malassezia, possess oxidative enzymes that might contribute to squalene breakdown. This could theoretically yield byproducts that interact with sebum or microbiota dynamics, but it does not directly supply Malassezia with the C12–C24 fatty acids it needs for growth.

Squalane and Acne: A Scientific Analysis

1. Squalene Oxidation and Acne Pathogenesis

A central mechanism in acne is the oxidation of squalene in sebum. When squalene converts into squalene hydroperoxide (SQOOH) or other oxides, it irritates follicular keratinocytes, triggers hyperkeratinization, and promotes microcomedone formation [6,7]. C. acnes further escalates oxidative stress via porphyrin production, while Malassezia’s lipoxygenase activity also drives peroxidation of unsaturated lipids. The resulting environment is inflamed, clogged, and perfect for breakout formation.

Because squalane lacks double bonds, it does not form these comedogenic or pro-inflammatory peroxides. This is why many dermatologists and skincare experts suggest that substituting squalane for other oils might help limit the formation of irritating peroxidation byproducts in acneic skin.

2. Potential Indirect Acne Effects

Although squalane is largely inert, some speculate about potential indirect pathways.

Residual impurities, such as trace squalene or fatty acids (common in lower-purity olive-derived batches), could, in theory, be oxidized or feed microbial lipases. However, reputable cosmetic squalane typically has very low peroxide values and minimal unsaturated residues.

Skin barrier modulation is another consideration. While squalane’s occlusivity is low compared to heavier oils, it can still reduce transepidermal water loss, supporting healthy barrier function and indirectly benefiting acne. A robust barrier can also reduce microbial imbalance, though direct clinical trials on squalane’s effect in acne are lacking.

3. Conflicting Data

Most conflicting opinions stem from anecdotal reports of breakouts when using squalane, or confusion between squalane (saturated) and squalene (unsaturated). Indeed, a small subset of individuals claims that squalane triggers or worsens their acne.

Without robust clinical trials, it remains challenging to confirm whether those breakouts arise from squalane itself, formulation impurities, or other co-formulated ingredients. Mechanistically, squalane is considered non-comedogenic and highly unlikely to feed C. acnes or Malassezia.

Squalane and Malassezia: Safe or Not?

1. Malassezia’s Nutrient Preferences

Malassezia species rely on external lipids, particularly medium-to-long-chain fatty acids (C12–C24) and their derivatives, for survival.

They possess lipases and phospholipases to free these fatty acids from sebum and cosmetic ingredients [1,3,4]. However, Malassezia generally lacks pathways to initiate oxidation of highly stable hydrocarbons like squalane.

A study by Dobler et al. found that most Malassezia species did not grow on saturated hydrocarbons such as squalane or silicone-based oils [1]. However, M. furfur could very slowly grow on unsaturated squalene or paraffin-like hydrocarbons, but not nearly as efficiently as on fatty acid esters or triglycerides.

Additionally, medium-chain fatty acids like caprylic acid (C8) exhibit antifungal activity against Malassezia [8], highlighting that short or inert lipids, are not a favored energy source for this yeast.

2. Squalane vs. Squalene in Malassezia Overgrowth

Unsaturated squalene is more readily attacked by Malassezia’s oxidative enzymes, yielding potential inflammatory mediators. By contrast, squalane lacks double bonds, rendering it metabolically uninteresting for Malassezia. 

Consequently, substituting squalene-rich oils with squalane in skincare may reduce the pool of oxidizable lipids, thereby lowering Malassezia-driven irritancy [6,7].

3. Counterpoints and Impurities

In rare cases, if squalane is contaminated with partial hydrogenation byproducts or residual squalene, Malassezia might exploit those unsaturated fractions. This is particularly relevant when comparing sugarcane-derived vs. olive-derived squalane. Furthermore, certain Mycobacterium species (not typically resident on healthy skin) can degrade squalane into smaller fatty acids that, in theory, could feed Malassezia [8]. 

Olive-derived squalane is obtained by hydrogenating squalene extracted from olive oil byproducts. However, this process is not always 100% efficient, meaning trace amounts of unsaturated squalene (or other olive-derived lipids) may remain. If not fully hydrogenated, residual squalene can oxidize into comedogenic and potentially inflammatory peroxides—one of the very compounds squalane is meant to avoid [1].

Additionally, some olive-derived squalane batches may contain sterol esters or free fatty acids, depending on refinement quality. While these typically account for a very small percentage, even trace amounts of C12-C24 fatty acids could theoretically be used by Malassezia.

Sugarcane-derived squalane, by contrast, is synthesized via bio-fermentation (often from farnesene, a sugar-derived precursor), resulting in a product that is typically around 99% pure hydrocarbons with no direct plant lipid contamination. This makes it the more chemically uniform and “fungal-safe” choice, as it lacks the sterol or fatty acid residues that Malassezia could metabolize.

4. Is Contamination with Malassezia-Usable Lipids a Real Concern?

Industry reports and manufacturer data suggest that most commercial squalane, regardless of source, contains a small percentage of impurities (often 0.1%–2% of non-squalane lipids). This can include long-chain alcohols, sterols, or fatty acid traces—compounds that Malassezia can metabolize if present in high enough quantities.

In practical terms, this could be a concern for some users, as the percentage of metabolizable impurities can lead to sustained Malassezia growth with repeated use overtime. 

Bottom Line on Impurities

While pure squalane itself is not a food source for Malassezia, trace impurities in lower-purity formulations (especially olive-derived ones) could, in theory, be utilized by the yeast.

For individuals with severe Malassezia sensitivity, opting for ultra-purified sugarcane-derived squalane is the best way to minimize potential contamination with fungal-usable lipids.

That said, even sugarcane-derived squalane is usually not 100% pure, meaning the risk is not entirely eliminated, but remains relatively low in well-refined formulations.

Final Assessment: Is Squalane Safe for Acne and Malassezia?

Based on current evidence:

  1. Minimal Metabolic Threat: Squalane’s saturated structure and lack of easily cleavable bonds make it an unlikely nutrient source for Malassezia or C. acnes.
  2. Reduced Oxidative Risk: Squalane does not form pro-inflammatory lipid peroxides like unsaturated squalene does, potentially mitigating a known trigger in acne pathogenesis.
  3. Skin Barrier Benefits: As a lightweight emollient, squalane supports the skin’s barrier without occlusion or fermentation by common skin microbes.
  4. Exceptions: Anecdotal reports of squalane-induced breakouts might stem from impurities or interactions with other ingredients. For extremely sensitive or reactive skin, choosing a reputable sugarcane-derived squalane with near 100% purity could potentially mitigate these concerns.

In conclusion, squalane is a safer option compared to plant oils for both acne-prone and Malassezia-sensitive skin, with biochemical data largely supporting its inert, non-comedogenic profile. However, trace impurities can introduce a small risk.

Future clinical studies comparing squalane-based and non-squalane-based regimens in people with stubborn acne or Malassezia folliculitis would be valuable for definitively quantifying any differences.

Until then, the existing research and mechanistic insights point to squalane as one of the better emollient choices for maintaining healthy skin and minimally fueling microbial overgrowth; medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) and their derivatives, such as caprylic/capric triglycerides, remain the superior option, as they not only avoid feeding Malassezia but also exhibit direct antifungal properties.

References:

  1. Dobler, D.; Schmidts, T.; Wildenhain, S.; Seewald, I.; Merzhäuser, M.; Runkel, F. Impact of Selected Cosmetic Ingredients on Common Microorganisms of Healthy Human Skin. Cosmetics 2019, 6, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6030045

  2. Lee YB, Byun EJ, Kim HS. Potential Role of the Microbiome in Acne: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 7;8(7):987. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070987. PMID: 31284694; PMCID: PMC6678709.

  3. Niedźwiedzka, A.; Micallef, M.P.; Biazzo, M.; Podrini, C. The Role of the Skin Microbiome in Acne: Challenges and Future Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111422

  4. Park M, Park S, Jung WH. Skin Commensal Fungus Malassezia and Its Lipases. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 May 28;31(5):637-644. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2012.12048. PMID: 33526754; PMCID: PMC9705927. 

  5. Tragiannidis, A.; Bisping, G.; Koehler, G.; Groll, A.H.
    Mini Review: Malassezia Infections in Immunocompromised Patients.
    Mycoses 2010, 53(3), 187–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01798.x. Epub 2009 Dec 17. PMID: 20028460.

  6. Ottaviani, M.; Camera, E.; Picardo, M. Lipid Mediators in Acne. Mediators of Inflammation 2010, 2010, 858176. doi: 10.1155/2010/858176. Ottaviani M, Camera E, Picardo M. Lipid mediators in acne. Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:858176. doi: 10.1155/2010/858176. Epub 2010 Aug 25. PMID: 20871834; PMCID: PMC2943135.

  7. Katsambas A, Dessinioti C. New and emerging treatments in dermatology: acne. Dermatol Ther. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00175.x. PMID: 18394082.

  8. Berekaa MM, Steinbüchel A. Microbial degradation of the multiply branched alkane 2,6,10,15,19, 23-hexamethyltetracosane (Squalane) by Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium ratisbonense. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Oct;66(10):4462-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.10.4462-4467.2000. PMID: 11010899; PMCID: PMC92325.

  9. Mayser P. Medium chain fatty acid ethyl esters - activation of antimicrobial effects by Malassezia enzymes. Mycoses. 2015 Apr;58(4):215-9. doi: 10.1111/myc.12300. Epub 2015 Feb 10. PMID: 25676074.

  10. Marito, S., Keshari, S., Traisaeng, S. et al. Electricity-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis counteracts Cutibacterium acnes. Sci Rep 11, 12001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91398-7

  11. Brown MM, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus epidermidis-Skin friend or foe? PLoS Pathog. 2020 Nov 12;16(11):e1009026. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009026. PMID: 33180890; PMCID: PMC7660545.
Back to Research